MedStatica
Medical statistics, made clinical.
Form MS-01
Rev 4.6
Web · beta

Describe your study in plain English. Get a plan you can actually use.

MedStatica is a biostatistics consult built for clinicians and trainees who were never taught the stats — the test to run, the numbers with confidence intervals, a methods paragraph to paste, and a read on whether the IRB needs to see it.

Get the launch invite See how it works coming to the App Store
Section 1 · Reason for consult example
Does a nurse-led discharge call reduce 30-day readmission? Retrospective cohort, ~2,000 patients.
↓   MedStatica returns   ↓
Study designRetrospective cohort
Recommended analysisChi-square test (2×2, Yates), with logistic regression if you adjust for age or comorbidity
RationaleYour outcome and exposure are both yes/no, so a 2×2 comparison is the natural primary test. If the groups differ at baseline, a logistic model adjusts without changing the question.
Methods paragraph — paste into your protocol We compared 30-day readmission between patients who received a nurse-led discharge call and those who did not using a chi-square test of independence with Yates continuity correction. Effect size is reported as an absolute risk reduction with a 95% confidence interval and as a number needed to treat per Altman (1998). A two-sided p < 0.05 was considered significant.
▲ Beyond simple tests once you adjust — bring the statistician questions along.
Every consult also returns a research-oversight read and a shareable memo. Statistics shown for illustration.

How it works

Four things, in the order you'd ask a colleague.

Not a calculator you have to already understand — a consult that meets you where a busy clinician actually is.

§ 01

Ask in plain language

Type the population, what you're comparing, and the outcome you care about. No test names required.

§ 02

Get the right test — and why

The recommended analysis with a plain-English rationale, the assumptions to check, and a citation trail back to the seminal papers.

§ 03

Know your oversight pathway

A read on likely IRB review — exempt, expedited, full board, or possible QI — with concrete next steps before you touch data.

§ 04

Hand it off cleanly

Export a one-page memo — your question, the plan, the oversight notes — for a statistician or research consult.

Section 3 · Research oversight

Most stats tools stop at the p-value. MedStatica also tells a trainee what a seasoned mentor would: whether this needs the IRB, and what to do first. It flags the likely pathway from your design — retrospective vs. prospective, identifiable data, intervention, vulnerable populations — and lists the next steps.

Orientation only. Exempt, expedited, or full-board status is a determination the IRB makes — never the investigator, and never the app.


On board at launch

The tests, in the order you learned them.

Four tiers mirroring a fellows' biostatistics course. Fill the highlighted cells; the margins, intervals, and plain-language reading compute live.

Tier 1 · DescribeMean (SD), median [IQR], range — with the symmetry check that tells you which to report.
Tier 2 · Compare two groupsChi-square (Yates), Welch and paired t, Pearson r, treatment 2×2 with RR, OR, and NNT.
Tier 3 · AdjustLogistic, linear, Cox, and Poisson — routed to a guided plan, because the hard part is specification, not arithmetic.
Tier 4 · Evaluate a testDiagnostic 2×2 — sensitivity, specificity, PPV/NPV, Youden's J, and likelihood ratios, all with Wilson intervals.

Plans

Free to start. Fair when you lean on it.

 FreePro · $6.99/moYour own key
Consults / month10 credits300 creditsunlimited
EnginesSwiftall threeall three
Every calculator
Oversight read & memo export

Credits per consult scale with model depth — Swift 1 · Balanced 3 · Deep 15 — mirroring relative cost.